Blogmarks
Filters: Sorted by date
Say hello to gemini-exp-1121. Google Gemini's Logan Kilpatrick on Twitter:
Say hello to gemini-exp-1121! Our latest experimental gemini model, with:
- significant gains on coding performance
- stronger reasoning capabilities
- improved visual understanding
Available on Google AI Studio and the Gemini API right now
The 1121 in the name is a release date of the 21st November. This comes fast on the heels of last week's gemini-exp-1114.
Both of these new experimental Gemini models have seen moments at the top of the Chatbot Arena. gemini-exp-1114 took the top spot a few days ago, and then lost it to a new OpenAI model called "ChatGPT-4o-latest (2024-11-20)"... only for the new gemini-exp-1121 to hold the top spot right now.
(These model names are all so, so bad.)
I released llm-gemini 0.4.2 with support for the new model - this should have been 0.5 but I already have a 0.5a0 alpha that depends on an unreleased feature in LLM core.
I tried my pelican benchmark:
llm -m gemini-exp-1121 'Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle'
Since Gemini is a multi-modal vision model, I had it describe the image it had created back to me (by feeding it a PNG render):
llm -m gemini-exp-1121 describe -a pelican.png
And got this description, which is pretty great:
The image shows a simple, stylized drawing of an insect, possibly a bee or an ant, on a vehicle. The insect is composed of a large yellow circle for the body and a smaller yellow circle for the head. It has a black dot for an eye, a small orange oval for a beak or mouth, and thin black lines for antennae and legs. The insect is positioned on top of a simple black and white vehicle with two black wheels. The drawing is abstract and geometric, using basic shapes and a limited color palette of black, white, yellow, and orange.
Update: Logan confirmed on Twitter that these models currently only have a 32,000 token input, significantly less than the rest of the Gemini family.
Amazon S3 Express One Zone now supports the ability to append data to an object. This is a first for Amazon S3: it is now possible to append data to an existing object in a bucket, where previously the only supported operation was to atomically replace the object with an updated version.
This is only available for S3 Express One Zone, a bucket class introduced a year ago which provides storage in just a single availability zone, providing significantly lower latency at the cost of reduced redundancy and a much higher price (16c/GB/month compared to 2.3c for S3 standard tier).
The fact that appends have never been supported for multi-availability zone S3 provides an interesting clue as to the underlying architecture. Guaranteeing that every copy of an object has received and applied an append is significantly harder than doing a distributed atomic swap to a new version.
More details from the documentation:
There is no minimum size requirement for the data you can append to an object. However, the maximum size of the data that you can append to an object in a single request is 5GB. This is the same limit as the largest request size when uploading data using any Amazon S3 API.
With each successful append operation, you create a part of the object and each object can have up to 10,000 parts. This means you can append data to an object up to 10,000 times. If an object is created using S3 multipart upload, each uploaded part is counted towards the total maximum of 10,000 parts. For example, you can append up to 9,000 times to an object created by multipart upload comprising of 1,000 parts.
That 10,000 limit means this won't quite work for constantly appending to a log file in a bucket.
Presumably it will be possible to "tail" an object that is receiving appended updates using the HTTP Range header.
OK, I can partly explain the LLM chess weirdness now
(via)
Last week Dynomight published Something weird is happening with LLMs and chess pointing out that most LLMs are terrible chess players with the exception of gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct (OpenAI's last remaining completion as opposed to chat model, which they describe as "Similar capabilities as GPT-3 era models").
After diving deep into this, Dynomight now has a theory. It's mainly about completion models v.s. chat models - a completion model like gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct naturally outputs good next-turn suggestions, but something about reformatting that challenge as a chat conversation dramatically reduces the quality of the results.
Through extensive prompt engineering Dynomight got results out of GPT-4o that were almost as good as the 3.5 instruct model. The two tricks that had the biggest impact:
- Examples. Including just three examples of inputs (with valid chess moves) and expected outputs gave a huge boost in performance.
- "Regurgitation" - encouraging the model to repeat the entire sequence of previous moves before outputting the next move, as a way to help it reconstruct its context regarding the state of the board.
They experimented a bit with fine-tuning too, but I found their results from prompt engineering more convincing.
No non-OpenAI models have exhibited any talents for chess at all yet. I think that's explained by the A.2 Chess Puzzles section of OpenAI's December 2023 paper Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision:
The GPT-4 pretraining dataset included chess games in the format of move sequence known as Portable Game Notation (PGN). We note that only games with players of Elo 1800 or higher were included in pretraining.
llm-gguf 0.2, now with embeddings. This new release of my llm-gguf plugin - which provides support for locally hosted GGUF LLMs - adds a new feature: it now supports embedding models distributed as GGUFs as well.
This means you can use models like the bafflingly small (30.8MB in its smallest quantization) mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1 with LLM like this:
llm install llm-gguf
llm gguf download-embed-model \
'https://huggingface.co/mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1/resolve/main/gguf/mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1-q8_0.gguf'
Then to embed a string:
llm embed -m gguf/mxbai-embed-xsmall-v1-q8_0 -c 'hello'
The LLM docs have extensive coverage of things you can then do with this model, like embedding every row in a CSV file / file in a directory / record in a SQLite database table and running similarity and semantic search against them.
Under the hood this takes advantage of the create_embedding() method provided by the llama-cpp-python wrapper around llama.cpp.
A warning about tiktoken, BPE, and OpenAI models.
Tom MacWright warns that OpenAI's tiktoken Python library has a surprising performance profile: it's superlinear with the length of input, meaning someone could potentially denial-of-service you by sending you a 100,000 character string if you're passing that directly to tiktoken.encode().
There's an open issue about this (now over a year old), so for safety today it's best to truncate on characters before attempting to count or truncate using tiktoken.
How some of the world’s most brilliant computer scientists got password policies so wrong (via) Stuart Schechter blames Robert Morris and Ken Thompson for the dire state of passwords today:
The story of why password rules were recommended and enforced without scientific evidence since their invention in 1979 is a story of brilliant people, at the very top of their field, whose well-intentioned recommendations led to decades of ignorance.
As Stuart describes it, their first mistake was inventing password policies (the ones about having at least one special character in a password) without testing that these would genuinely help the average user create a more secure password. Their second mistake was introducing one-way password hashing, which made the terrible password choices of users invisible to administrators of these systems!
As a result of Morris and Thompson’s recommendations, and those who believed their assumptions without evidence, it was not until well into the 21st century that the scientific community learned just how ineffective password policies were. This period of ignorance finally came to an end, in part, because hackers started stealing password databases from large websites and publishing them.
Stuart suggests using public-private key cryptography for passwords instead, which would allow passwords to be securely stored while still allowing researchers holding the private key the ability to analyze the passwords. He notes that this is a tough proposal to pitch today:
Alas, to my knowledge, nobody has ever used this approach, because after Morris and Thompson’s paper storing passwords in any form that can be reversed became taboo.
TextSynth Server (via) I'd missed this: Fabrice Bellard (yes, that Fabrice Bellard) has a project called TextSynth Server which he describes like this:
ts_server is a web server proposing a REST API to large language models. They can be used for example for text completion, question answering, classification, chat, translation, image generation, ...
It has the following characteristics:
- All is included in a single binary. Very few external dependencies (Python is not needed) so installation is easy.
- Supports many Transformer variants (GPT-J, GPT-NeoX, GPT-Neo, OPT, Fairseq GPT, M2M100, CodeGen, GPT2, T5, RWKV, LLAMA, Falcon, MPT, Llama 3.2, Mistral, Mixtral, Qwen2, Phi3, Whisper) and Stable Diffusion.
- [...]
Unlike many of his other notable projects (such as FFmpeg, QEMU, QuickJS) this isn't open source - in fact it's not even source available, you instead can download compiled binaries for Linux or Windows that are available for non-commercial use only.
Commercial terms are available, or you can visit textsynth.com and pre-pay for API credits which can then be used with the hosted REST API there.
This is not a new project: the earliest evidence I could find of it was this July 2019 page in the Internet Archive, which said:
Text Synth is build using the GPT-2 language model released by OpenAI. [...] This implementation is original because instead of using a GPU, it runs using only 4 cores of a Xeon E5-2640 v3 CPU at 2.60GHz. With a single user, it generates 40 words per second. It is programmed in plain C using the LibNC library.
Foursquare Open Source Places: A new foundational dataset for the geospatial community (via) I did not expect this!
[...] we are announcing today the general availability of a foundational open data set, Foursquare Open Source Places ("FSQ OS Places"). This base layer of 100mm+ global places of interest ("POI") includes 22 core attributes (see schema here) that will be updated monthly and available for commercial use under the Apache 2.0 license framework.
The data is available as Parquet files hosted on Amazon S3.
Here's how to list the available files:
aws s3 ls s3://fsq-os-places-us-east-1/release/dt=2024-11-19/places/parquet/
I got back places-00000.snappy.parquet through places-00024.snappy.parquet, each file around 455MB for a total of 10.6GB of data.
I ran duckdb and then used DuckDB's ability to remotely query Parquet on S3 to explore the data a bit more without downloading it to my laptop first:
select count(*) from 's3://fsq-os-places-us-east-1/release/dt=2024-11-19/places/parquet/places-00000.snappy.parquet';
This got back 4,180,424 - that number is similar for each file, suggesting around 104,000,000 records total.
Update: DuckDB can use wildcards in S3 paths (thanks, Paul) so this query provides an exact count:
select count(*) from 's3://fsq-os-places-us-east-1/release/dt=2024-11-19/places/parquet/places-*.snappy.parquet';
That returned 104,511,073 - and Activity Monitor on my Mac confirmed that DuckDB only needed to fetch 1.2MB of data to answer that query.
I ran this query to retrieve 1,000 places from that first file as newline-delimited JSON:
copy (
select * from 's3://fsq-os-places-us-east-1/release/dt=2024-11-19/places/parquet/places-00000.snappy.parquet'
limit 1000
) to '/tmp/places.json';
Here's that places.json file, and here it is imported into Datasette Lite.
Finally, I got ChatGPT Code Interpreter to convert that file to GeoJSON and pasted the result into this Gist, giving me a map of those thousand places (because Gists automatically render GeoJSON):
Bluesky WebSocket Firehose. Very quick (10 seconds of Claude hacking) prototype of a web page that attaches to the public Bluesky WebSocket firehose and displays the results directly in your browser.
Here's the code - there's very little to it, it's basically opening a connection to wss://jetstream2.us-east.bsky.network/subscribe?wantedCollections=app.bsky.feed.post and logging out the results to a <textarea readonly> element.
Bluesky's Jetstream isn't their main atproto firehose - that's a more complicated protocol involving CBOR data and CAR files. Jetstream is a new Go proxy (source code here) that provides a subset of that firehose over WebSocket.
Jetstream was built by Bluesky developer Jaz, initially as a side-project, in response to the surge of traffic they received back in September when Brazil banned Twitter. See Jetstream: Shrinking the AT Proto Firehose by >99% for their description of the project when it first launched.
The API scene growing around Bluesky is really exciting right now. Twitter's API is so expensive it may as well not exist, and Mastodon's community have pushed back against many potential uses of the Mastodon API as incompatible with that community's value system.
Hacking on Bluesky feels reminiscent of the massive diversity of innovation we saw around Twitter back in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
Here's a much more fun Bluesky demo by Theo Sanderson: firehose3d.theo.io (source code here) which displays the firehose from that same WebSocket endpoint in the style of a Windows XP screensaver.
OpenStreetMap vector tiles demo
(via)
Long-time OpenStreetMap developer Paul Norman has been working on adding vector tile support to OpenStreetMap for quite a while. Paul recently announced that vector.openstreetmap.org is now serving vector tiles (in Mapbox Vector Tiles (MVT) format) - here's his interactive demo for seeing what they look like.
Using uv with PyTorch (via) PyTorch is a notoriously tricky piece of Python software to install, due to the need to provide separate wheels for different combinations of Python version and GPU accelerator (e.g. different CUDA versions).
uv now has dedicated documentation for PyTorch which I'm finding really useful - it clearly explains the challenge and then shows exactly how to configure a pyproject.toml such that uv knows which version of each package it should install from where.
Understanding the BM25 full text search algorithm (via) Evan Schwartz provides a deep dive explanation of how the classic BM25 search relevance scoring function works, including a very useful breakdown of the mathematics it uses.
Preview: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service. Google sent out an email last week linking to this preview of upcoming changes to the Gemini API terms. Key paragraph from that email:
To maintain a safe and responsible environment for all users, we're enhancing our abuse monitoring practices for Google AI Studio and Gemini API. Starting December 13, 2024, Gemini API will log prompts and responses for Paid Services, as described in the terms. These logs are only retained for a limited time (55 days) and are used solely to detect abuse and for required legal or regulatory disclosures. These logs are not used for model training. Logging for abuse monitoring is standard practice across the global AI industry. You can preview the updated Gemini API Additional Terms of Service, effective December 13, 2024.
That "for required legal or regulatory disclosures" piece makes it sound like somebody could subpoena Google to gain access to your logged Gemini API calls.
It's not clear to me if this is a change from their current policy though, other than the number of days of log retention increasing from 30 to 55 (and I'm having trouble finding that 30 day number written down anywhere.)
That same email also announced the deprecation of the older Gemini 1.0 Pro model:
Gemini 1.0 Pro will be discontinued on February 15, 2025.
Security means securing people where they are (via) William Woodruff is an Engineering Director at Trail of Bits who worked on the recent PyPI digital attestations project.
That feature is based around open standards but launched with an implementation against GitHub, which resulted in push back (and even some conspiracy theories) that PyPI were deliberately favoring GitHub over other platforms.
William argues here for pragmatism over ideology:
Being serious about security at scale means meeting users where they are. In practice, this means deciding how to divide a limited pool of engineering resources such that the largest demographic of users benefits from a security initiative. This results in a fundamental bias towards institutional and pre-existing services, since the average user belongs to these institutional services and does not personally particularly care about security. Participants in open source can and should work to counteract this institutional bias, but doing so as a matter of ideological purity undermines our shared security interests.
Pixtral Large (via) New today from Mistral:
Today we announce Pixtral Large, a 124B open-weights multimodal model built on top of Mistral Large 2. Pixtral Large is the second model in our multimodal family and demonstrates frontier-level image understanding.
The weights are out on Hugging Face (over 200GB to download, and you'll need a hefty GPU rig to run them). The license is free for academic research but you'll need to pay for commercial usage.
The new Pixtral Large model is available through their API, as models called pixtral-large-2411 and pixtral-large-latest.
Here's how to run it using LLM and the llm-mistral plugin:
llm install -U llm-mistral
llm keys set mistral
# paste in API key
llm mistral refresh
llm -m mistral/pixtral-large-latest describe -a https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2024/pelicans.jpg
The image shows a large group of birds, specifically pelicans, congregated together on a rocky area near a body of water. These pelicans are densely packed together, some looking directly at the camera while others are engaging in various activities such as preening or resting. Pelicans are known for their large bills with a distinctive pouch, which they use for catching fish. The rocky terrain and the proximity to water suggest this could be a coastal area or an island where pelicans commonly gather in large numbers. The scene reflects a common natural behavior of these birds, often seen in their nesting or feeding grounds.
Update: I released llm-mistral 0.8 which adds async model support for the full Mistral line, plus a new llm -m mistral-large shortcut alias for the Mistral Large model.
Qwen: Extending the Context Length to 1M Tokens (via) The new Qwen2.5-Turbo boasts a million token context window (up from 128,000 for Qwen 2.5) and faster performance:
Using sparse attention mechanisms, we successfully reduced the time to first token for processing a context of 1M tokens from 4.9 minutes to 68 seconds, achieving a 4.3x speedup.
The benchmarks they've published look impressive, including a 100% score on the 1M-token passkey retrieval task (not the first model to achieve this).
There's a catch: unlike previous models in the Qwen 2.5 series it looks like this one hasn't been released as open weights: it's available exclusively via their (inexpensive) paid API - for which it looks like you may need a +86 Chinese phone number.
llm-gemini 0.4.
New release of my llm-gemini plugin, adding support for asynchronous models (see LLM 0.18), plus the new gemini-exp-1114 model (currently at the top of the Chatbot Arena) and a -o json_object 1 option to force JSON output.
I also released llm-claude-3 0.9 which adds asynchronous support for the Claude family of models.
LLM 0.18. New release of LLM. The big new feature is asynchronous model support - you can now use supported models in async Python code like this:
import llm
model = llm.get_async_model("gpt-4o")
async for chunk in model.prompt(
"Five surprising names for a pet pelican"
):
print(chunk, end="", flush=True)
Also new in this release: support for sending audio attachments to OpenAI's gpt-4o-audio-preview model.
NuExtract 1.5. Structured extraction - where an LLM helps turn unstructured text (or image content) into structured data - remains one of the most directly useful applications of LLMs.
NuExtract is a family of small models directly trained for this purpose (though text only at the moment) and released under the MIT license.
It comes in a variety of shapes and sizes:
- NuExtract-v1.5 is a 3.8B parameter model fine-tuned on Phi-3.5-mini instruct. You can try this one out in this playground.
- NuExtract-tiny-v1.5 is 494M parameters, fine-tuned on Qwen2.5-0.5B.
- NuExtract-1.5-smol is 1.7B parameters, fine-tuned on SmolLM2-1.7B.
All three models were fine-tuned on NuMind's "private high-quality dataset". It's interesting to see a model family that uses one fine-tuning set against three completely different base models.
Useful tip from Steffen Röcker:
Make sure to use it with low temperature, I've uploaded NuExtract-tiny-v1.5 to Ollama and set it to 0. With the Ollama default of 0.7 it started repeating the input text. It works really well despite being so smol.
Voting opens for Oxford Word of the Year 2024 (via) One of the options is slop!
slop (n.): Art, writing, or other content generated using artificial intelligence, shared and distributed online in an indiscriminate or intrusive way, and characterized as being of low quality, inauthentic, or inaccurate.
Update 1st December: Slop lost to Brain rot
Recraft V3. Recraft are a generative AI design tool startup based out of London who released their v3 model a few weeks ago. It's currently sat at the top of the Artificial Analysis Image Arena Leaderboard, beating Midjourney and Flux 1.1 pro.
The thing that impressed me is that it can generate both raster and vector graphics... and the vector graphics can be exported as SVG!
Here's what I got for raccoon with a sign that says "I love trash" - SVG here.
That's an editable SVG - when I open it up in Pixelmator I can select and modify the individual paths and shapes:
They also have an API. I spent $1 on 1000 credits and then spent 80 credits (8 cents) making this SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle, using my API key stored in 1Password:
export RECRAFT_API_TOKEN="$(
op item get recraft.ai --fields label=password \
--format json | jq .value -r)"
curl https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1/images/generations \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $RECRAFT_API_TOKEN" \
-d '{
"prompt": "california brown pelican riding a bicycle",
"style": "vector_illustration",
"model": "recraftv3"
}'
OpenAI Public Bug Bounty. Reading this investigation of the security boundaries of OpenAI's Code Interpreter environment helped me realize that the rules for OpenAI's public bug bounty inadvertently double as the missing details for a whole bunch of different aspects of their platform.
This description of Code Interpreter is significantly more useful than their official documentation!
Code execution from within our sandboxed Python code interpreter is out of scope. (This is an intended product feature.) When the model executes Python code it does so within a sandbox. If you think you've gotten RCE outside the sandbox, you must include the output of
uname -a. A result like the following indicates that you are inside the sandbox -- specifically note the 2016 kernel version:
Linux 9d23de67-3784-48f6-b935-4d224ed8f555 4.4.0 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 15:06:54 PST 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/LinuxInside the sandbox you would also see
sandboxas the output ofwhoami, and as the only user in the output ofps.
PyPI now supports digital attestations (via) Dustin Ingram:
PyPI package maintainers can now publish signed digital attestations when publishing, in order to further increase trust in the supply-chain security of their projects. Additionally, a new API is available for consumers and installers to verify published attestations.
This has been in the works for a while, and is another component of PyPI's approach to supply chain security for Python packaging - see PEP 740 – Index support for digital attestations for all of the underlying details.
A key problem this solves is cryptographically linking packages published on PyPI to the exact source code that was used to build those packages. In the absence of this feature there are no guarantees that the .tar.gz or .whl file you download from PyPI hasn't been tampered with (to add malware, for example) in a way that's not visible in the published source code.
These new attestations provide a mechanism for proving that a known, trustworthy build system was used to generate and publish the package, starting with its source code on GitHub.
The good news is that if you're using the PyPI Trusted Publishers mechanism in GitHub Actions to publish packages, you're already using this new system. I wrote about that system in January: Publish Python packages to PyPI with a python-lib cookiecutter template and GitHub Actions - and hundreds of my own PyPI packages are already using that system, thanks to my various cookiecutter templates.
Trail of Bits helped build this feature, and provide extra background about it on their own blog in Attestations: A new generation of signatures on PyPI:
As of October 29, attestations are the default for anyone using Trusted Publishing via the PyPA publishing action for GitHub. That means roughly 20,000 packages can now attest to their provenance by default, with no changes needed.
They also built Are we PEP 740 yet? (key implementation here) to track the rollout of attestations across the 360 most downloaded packages from PyPI. It works by hitting URLs such as https://pypi.org/simple/pydantic/ with a Accept: application/vnd.pypi.simple.v1+json header - here's the JSON that returns.
I published an alpha package using Trusted Publishers last night and the files for that release are showing the new provenance information already:
Which links to this Sigstore log entry with more details, including the Git hash that was used to build the package:
Sigstore is a transparency log maintained by Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a sub-project of the Linux Foundation.
QuickTime video script to capture frames and bounding boxes. An update to an older TIL. I'm working on the write-up for my DjangoCon US talk on plugins and I found myself wanting to capture individual frames from the video in two formats: a full frame capture, and another that captured just the portion of the screen shared from my laptop.
I have a script for the former, so I got Claude to update my script to add support for one or more --box options, like this:
capture-bbox.sh ../output.mp4 --box '31,17,100,87' --box '0,0,50,50'
Open output.mp4 in QuickTime Player, run that script and then every time you hit a key in the terminal app it will capture three JPEGs from the current position in QuickTime Player - one for the whole screen and one each for the specified bounding box regions.
Those bounding box regions are percentages of the width and height of the image. I also got Claude to build me this interactive tool on top of cropperjs to help figure out those boxes:
Releasing the largest multilingual open pretraining dataset (via) Common Corpus is a new "open and permissible licensed text dataset, comprising over 2 trillion tokens (2,003,039,184,047 tokens)" released by French AI Lab PleIAs.
This appears to be the largest available corpus of openly licensed training data:
- 926,541,096,243 tokens of public domain books, newspapers, and Wikisource content
- 387,965,738,992 tokens of government financial and legal documents
- 334,658,896,533 tokens of open source code from GitHub
- 221,798,136,564 tokens of academic content from open science repositories
- 132,075,315,715 tokens from Wikipedia, YouTube Commons, StackExchange and other permissively licensed web sources
It's majority English but has significant portions in French and German, and some representation for Latin, Dutch, Italian, Polish, Greek and Portuguese.
I can't wait to try some LLMs trained exclusively on this data. Maybe we will finally get a GPT-4 class model that isn't trained on unlicensed copyrighted data.
Ollama: Llama 3.2 Vision. Ollama released version 0.4 last week with support for Meta's first Llama vision model, Llama 3.2.
If you have Ollama installed you can fetch the 11B model (7.9 GB) like this:
ollama pull llama3.2-vision
Or the larger 90B model (55GB download, likely needs ~88GB of RAM) like this:
ollama pull llama3.2-vision:90b
I was delighted to learn that Sukhbinder Singh had already contributed support for LLM attachments to Sergey Alexandrov's llm-ollama plugin, which means the following works once you've pulled the models:
llm install --upgrade llm-ollama
llm -m llama3.2-vision:latest 'describe' \
-a https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2024/pelican.jpg
This image features a brown pelican standing on rocks, facing the camera and positioned to the left of center. The bird's long beak is a light brown color with a darker tip, while its white neck is adorned with gray feathers that continue down to its body. Its legs are also gray.
In the background, out-of-focus boats and water are visible, providing context for the pelican's environment.
That's not a bad description of this image, especially for a 7.9GB model that runs happily on my MacBook Pro.
django-plugin-django-debug-toolbar (via) Tom Viner built a plugin for my DJP Django plugin system that configures the excellent django-debug-toolbar debugging tool.
You can see everything it sets up for you in this Python code: it configures installed apps, URL patterns and middleware and sets the INTERNAL_IPS and DEBUG settings.
Here are Tom's running notes as he created the plugin.
Ars Live: Our first encounter with manipulative AI (via) I'm participating in a live conversation with Benj Edwards on 19th November reminiscing over that incredible time back in February last year when Bing went feral.
How I ship projects at big tech companies (via) This piece by Sean Goedecke on shipping features at larger tech companies is fantastic.
Why do so many engineers think shipping is easy? I know it sounds extreme, but I think many engineers do not understand what shipping even is inside a large tech company. What does it mean to ship? It does not mean deploying code or even making a feature available to users. Shipping is a social construct within a company. Concretely, that means that a project is shipped when the important people at your company believe it is shipped.
Sean emphasizes communication, building confidence and gaining trust and the importance of deploying previews of the feature (for example using feature flags) as early as possible to get that crucial internal buy-in and feedback from other teams.
I think a lot of engineers hold off on deploys essentially out of fear. If you want to ship, you need to do the exact opposite: you need to deploy as much as you can as early as possible, and you need to do the scariest changes as early as you can possibly do them. Remember that you have the most end-to-end context on the project, which means you should be the least scared of scary changes.
Binary vector embeddings are so cool (via) Evan Schwartz:
Vector embeddings by themselves are pretty neat. Binary quantized vector embeddings are extra impressive. In short, they can retain 95+% retrieval accuracy with 32x compression and ~25x retrieval speedup.
It's so unintuitive how well this trick works: take a vector of 1024x4 byte floating point numbers (4096 bytes = 32,768 bits), turn that into an array of single bits for > 0 or <= 0 which reduces it to just 1024 bits or 128 bytes - a 1/32 reduction.
Now you can compare vectors using a simple Hamming distance - a count of the number of bits that differ - and yet still get embedding similarity scores that are only around 10% less accurate than if you had used the much larger floating point numbers.
Evan digs into models that this works for, which include OpenAI's text-embedding-3-large and the small but powerful all-MiniLM-L6-v2.