4 posts tagged “decision-models”
A new shape of LLM, pioneered by Jev.
2026
Gemini Decisions API (via) Google join Jev and OpenAI in the decision model category with "Gemini Decision 1". This new model API is almost identical to Jev: it supports the same three types of questions (yes/no, choice, and rubric-scoring) and even reuses Jev's term "Noul" for a yes/no question.
It's priced the same as the GPT-6 Luna decision model: 10 cents per million input tokens, and output is free. Jev remains the cheapest of the three, at 4.2 cents per million.
Jev is text (and JSON) only. OpenAI can handle text and images. Gemini Decision 1 is fully multi-model: it covers text, images, audio, video, and PDFs.
I tested it against video by passing these questions to it along with my Yonkers stomping robot video file:
dragon: Does this video have a dragon in it?
robot: Does this video have a robot in it?
france: Is this video set in France?
usa: Is this video set in the USA?
Jev and OpenAI both return 1.0 or 0.0 for yes/no questions, but Gemini insists on being a little less confident than that:
{
"dragon": {
"type": "yes_no",
"probability": 0.04976021841520312
},
"robot": {
"type": "yes_no",
"probability": 0.9234055387792485
},
"france": {
"type": "yes_no",
"probability": 0.08329171353166241
},
"usa": {
"type": "yes_no",
"probability": 0.9230459995157706
}
}OpenAI released their new Jev-style Decisions API, as previously announced at last week's DevDay.
Since I already have an llm-typesafe plugin for talking to Jev, I had GPT-6 Astra read the new OpenAI API documentation and build an llm-openai-decisions plugin inspired by llm-typesafe.
Unlike Jev, the new gpt-6-luna decision model supports image input in addition to text. Both models charge for input it and not for output: OpenAI's is 10 cents per million input tokens, Jev's is 4.2 cents per million.
Otherwise the API shape is very similar to Jev, at least conceptually. Jev supports three question types for yes/no, choices, or scores. OpenAI Decisions supports the same three types.
Install the plugin like this:
llm install llm-openai-decisions
Here's an example query against an image attachment:
llm -m openai-decisions/gpt-6-luna \
-a https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2025/two-pelicans.jpg \
-s 'Does this image contain any mammals?'And example output:
{"type": "predicate", "name": "evaluation", "probability": 0.0}Consult the README for full details of how to run the other types of questions.
I built this new plugin for LLM to add support for TypeSafe AI's new Jev model. Install it like this:
llm install llm-typesafe
Then set an API key (get one here, the waitlist seems to move pretty fast):
llm keys set typesafe
# Paste key
And now you can ask yes/no "noul" questions like this:
llm -m jev 'Please refund my last payment.' \
-s 'Does this message explicitly request a refund?'
Output:
{"type": "noul", "noul": 0.99}
Or choice questions like this:
cat message.txt | llm -m jev \
-s 'Which team should handle this message? If billing and technical issues both occur, choose billing.' \
-o answer_type choice \
-o criteria '{
"billing":"Charges, invoices, payments, or refunds",
"technical":"Problems installing or using the product",
"other":"Neither category fits"
}'Or scoring questions like this:
cat report.txt | llm -m jev \
-s 'How reproducible is the problem described in this report?' \
-o answer_type score \
-o criteria '[
"No reproduction instructions",
"Some instructions, but important steps are missing",
"Complete steps with expected and actual results"
]'See the README for more details.
Jev introduces a new shape of LLM—System One, aka Decision Models
Last week TypeSafe AI unveiled Jev, their first example of a new category of model that they are calling “System One models” (I’m with Maggie Appleton, I think “decision models” is a better name for these). Jev is an interesting variant on the usual LLM format: it still accepts text inputs, but instead of text output it returns floating point numbers corresponding to categories, yes/no questions, ratings, and associated confidence scores.
[... 988 words]