Simon Willison’s Weblog

Subscribe
Atom feed for clay-shirky

9 items tagged “clay-shirky”

2009

It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves - the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public - has stopped being a problem.

Clay Shirky

# 15th March 2009, 5:09 am / clay-shirky, newspapers, publishing

What the Internet has actually done is not decimate literary reading; that was really a done deal by 1970. What it has done, instead, is brought back reading and writing as a normal activity for a huge group of people.

Clay Shirky

# 13th January 2009, 2:22 pm / clay-shirky, tv, internet, reading

2008

There are two [Wikipedias]: One is the public-facing reliable-enough-on-average encyclopedia that people read every day, which makes for nice fluff pieces in the media about "these new Web thingamajigs that the kids are building, aren't they neat?". The other is the insular behind-the-scenes bureaucracy, which reads like an improvised performance of the collected writings of Clay Shirky.

James Bennett

# 16th June 2008, 8:16 am / james-bennett, wikipedia, clay-shirky, snark

Consumption is also about choice. Tom Armitage’s thoughtful response to Clay Shirky’s Web 2.0 talk on television as “cognitive surplus”.

# 1st May 2008, 1:01 pm / clay-shirky, cognitivesurplus, consumption, tom-armitage, tv

2005

Tags != folksonomies && Tags != Flat name spaces. Clay Shirky’s latest thoughts on tags.

# 25th January 2005, 10:54 pm / clay-shirky, tagging

2004

Shirky: The Possibility of Spectrum as a Public Good (via) Unlicensed spectrum explained by Clay Shirky.

# 15th August 2004, 12:10 am / clay-shirky

2003

The RIAA Succeeds Where the Cypherpunks Failed (via) Shirky compares file sharing to prohibition

# 18th December 2003, 7:58 pm / clay-shirky

Clearout

Chat rooms and meetings

In-Room Chat as a Social Tool: Clay Shirky describes an experiment with an online chat room set up to accompany a meeting of 30 people taking place in the same room. The chat room (available to attendees via Wifi laptops and displayed on a big screen at the front of the room) had some interesting effects on the dynamics of the meeting, not least of which was the dramatic impact the chat room had on the “interrupt logic” of the proceedings.