6 posts tagged “semantic-diffusion”
Semantic diffusion occurs when a new piece of jargon inevitably takes on an unintended and incorrect definition as it uncontrollably spreads beyond its origin.
2025
There's a new kind of coding I call "hype coding" where you fully give into the hype, and what's coming right around the corner, that you lose sight of whats' possible today. Everything is changing so fast that nobody has time to learn any tool, but we should aim to use as many as possible. Any limitation in the technology can be chalked up to a 'skill issue' or that it'll be solved in the next AI release next week. Thinking is dead. Turn off your brain and let the computer think for you. Scroll on tiktok while the armies of agents code for you. If it isn't right, tell it to try again. Don't read. Feed outputs back in until it works. If you can't get it to work, wait for the next model or tool release. Maybe you didn't use enough MCP servers? Don't forget to add to the hype cycle by aggrandizing all your successes. Don't read this whole tweet, because it's too long. Get an AI to summarize it for you. Then call it "cope". Most importantly, immediately mischaracterize "hype coding" to mean something different than this definition. Oh the irony! The people who don't care about details don't read the details about not reading the details
I was grumbling to myself about how if we're going to give in, ditch the proper definition and use "vibe coding" to refer to all forms of AI-assisted programming, where do we draw the line?
Is it "vibe coding" if my IDE suggests the completion of a single line of code? How about if I copy and paste in a three line "escape HTML characters" function from ChatGPT? What if I copy and paste some code from StackOverflow that it turns out was AI-generated by someone else? How much AI-assistance does it take to switch from programming to "vibe coding"?
Then I realized that the answer was staring me in the face. There is no clear line. It's all in the vibes.
Two publishers and three authors fail to understand what “vibe coding” means
Vibe coding does not mean “using AI tools to help write code”. It means “generating code with AI without caring about the code that is produced”. See Not all AI-assisted programming is vibe coding for my previous writing on this subject. This is a hill I am willing to die on. I fear it will be the death of me.
[... 875 words]Semantic Diffusion. I learned about this term today while complaining about how the definition of "vibe coding" is already being distorted to mean "any time an LLM writes code" as opposed to the intended meaning of "code I wrote with an LLM without even reviewing what it wrote".
I posted this salty note:
Feels like I'm losing the battle on this one, I keep seeing people use "vibe coding" to mean any time an LLM is used to write code
I'm particularly frustrated because for a few glorious moments we had the chance at having ONE piece of AI-related terminology with a clear, widely accepted definition!
But it turns out people couldn't be trusted to read all the way to the end of Andrej's tweet, so now we are back to yet another term where different people assume it means different things
Martin Fowler coined Semantic Diffusion in 2006 with this very clear definition:
Semantic diffusion occurs when you have a word that is coined by a person or group, often with a pretty good definition, but then gets spread through the wider community in a way that weakens that definition. This weakening risks losing the definition entirely - and with it any usefulness to the term. [...]
Semantic diffusion is essentially a succession of the telephone game where a different group of people to the originators of a term start talking about it without being careful about following the original definition.
What's happening with vibe coding right now is such a clear example of this effect in action! I've seen the same thing happen to my own coinage prompt injection over the past couple of years.
This kind of dillution of meaning is frustrating, but does appear to be inevitable. As Martin Fowler points out it's most likely to happen to popular terms - the more popular a term is the higher the chance a game of telephone will ensue where misunderstandings flourish as the chain continues to grow.
Andrej Karpathy, who coined vibe coding, posted this just now in reply to my article:
Good post! It will take some time to settle on definitions. Personally I use "vibe coding" when I feel like this dog. My iOS app last night being a good example. But I find that in practice I rarely go full out vibe coding, and more often I still look at the code, I add complexity slowly and I try to learn over time how the pieces work, to ask clarifying questions etc.
I love that vibe coding has an official illustrative GIF now!
Not all AI-assisted programming is vibe coding (but vibe coding rocks)
Vibe coding is having a moment. The term was coined by Andrej Karpathy just a few weeks ago (on February 6th) and has since been featured in the New York Times, Ars Technica, the Guardian and countless online discussions.
[... 1,486 words]2024
Prompt injection and jailbreaking are not the same thing
I keep seeing people use the term “prompt injection” when they’re actually talking about “jailbreaking”.
[... 1,157 words]