Languages that allow for a structurally similar codebase offer a significant boon for anyone making code changes because we can easily port changes between the two codebases. In contrast, languages that require fundamental rethinking of memory management, mutation, data structuring, polymorphism, laziness, etc., might be a better fit for a ground-up rewrite, but we're undertaking this more as a port that maintains the existing behavior and critical optimizations we've built into the language. Idiomatic Go strongly resembles the existing coding patterns of the TypeScript codebase, which makes this porting effort much more tractable.
— Ryan Cavanaugh, on why TypeScript chose to rewrite in Go, not Rust
Recent articles
- Live blog: Claude 4 launch at Code with Claude - 22nd May 2025
- I really don't like ChatGPT's new memory dossier - 21st May 2025
- Building software on top of Large Language Models - 15th May 2025