20th April 2025
In some tasks, AI is unreliable. In others, it is superhuman. You could, of course, say the same thing about calculators, but it is also clear that AI is different. It is already demonstrating general capabilities and performing a wide range of intellectual tasks, including those that it is not specifically trained on. Does that mean that o3 and Gemini 2.5 are AGI? Given the definitional problems, I really don’t know, but I do think they can be credibly seen as a form of “Jagged AGI” - superhuman in enough areas to result in real changes to how we work and live, but also unreliable enough that human expertise is often needed to figure out where AI works and where it doesn’t.
— Ethan Mollick, On Jagged AGI
Recent articles
- OpenAI’s accidental cyberattack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened - 22nd July 2026
- A Fireside Chat with Cat and Thariq from the Claude Code team - 21st July 2026
- Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark - 16th July 2026