30th May 2024
The realization hit me [when the GPT-3 paper came out] that an important property of the field flipped. In ~2011, progress in AI felt constrained primarily by algorithms. We needed better ideas, better modeling, better approaches to make further progress. If you offered me a 10X bigger computer, I'm not sure what I would have even used it for. GPT-3 paper showed that there was this thing that would just become better on a large variety of practical tasks, if you only trained a bigger one. Better algorithms become a bonus, not a necessity for progress in AGI. Possibly not forever and going forward, but at least locally and for the time being, in a very practical sense. Today, if you gave me a 10X bigger computer I would know exactly what to do with it, and then I'd ask for more.
Recent articles
- Is Claude Code going to cost $100/month? Probably not - it's all very confusing - 22nd April 2026
- Where's the raccoon with the ham radio? (ChatGPT Images 2.0) - 21st April 2026
- Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7 - 18th April 2026