[On Meta's Galactica LLM launch] We did this with a 8 person team which is an order of magnitude fewer people than other LLM teams at the time.
We were overstretched and lost situational awareness at launch by releasing demo of a base model without checks. We were aware of what potential criticisms would be, but we lost sight of the obvious in the workload we were under.
One of the considerations for a demo was we wanted to understand the distribution of scientific queries that people would use for LLMs (useful for instruction tuning and RLHF). Obviously this was a free goal we gave to journalists who instead queried it outside its domain. But yes we should have known better.
We had a “good faith” assumption that we’d share the base model, warts and all, with four disclaimers about hallucinations on the demo - so people could see what it could do (openness). Again, obviously this didn’t work.
Recent articles
- Reverse engineering Codex CLI to get GPT-5-Codex-Mini to draw me a pelican - 9th November 2025
- Video + notes on upgrading a Datasette plugin for the latest 1.0 alpha, with help from uv and OpenAI Codex CLI - 6th November 2025
- Code research projects with async coding agents like Claude Code and Codex - 6th November 2025