We like to assume that automation technology will maintain or increase wage levels for a few skilled supervisors. But in the long-term skilled automation supervisors also tend to earn less.
Here's an example: In 1801 the Jacquard loom was invented, which automated silkweaving with punchcards. Around 1800, a manual weaver could earn 30 shillings/week. By the 1830s the same weaver would only earn around 5s/week. A Jacquard operator earned 15s/week, but he was also 12x more productive.
The Jacquard operator upskilled and became an automation supervisor, but their wage still dropped. For manual weavers the wages dropped even more. If we believe assistive AI will deliver unseen productivity gains, we can assume that wage erosion will also be unprecedented.
Recent articles
- LLM 0.27, the annotated release notes: GPT-5 and improved tool calling - 11th August 2025
- Qwen3-4B-Thinking: "This is art - pelicans don't ride bikes!" - 10th August 2025
- My Lethal Trifecta talk at the Bay Area AI Security Meetup - 9th August 2025