26th September 2024
I think individual creators or publishers tend to overestimate the value of their specific content in the grand scheme of [AI training]. […]
We pay for content when it’s valuable to people. We’re just not going to pay for content when it’s not valuable to people. I think that you’ll probably see a similar dynamic with AI, which my guess is that there are going to be certain partnerships that get made when content is really important and valuable. I’d guess that there are probably a lot of people who have a concern about the feel of it, like you’re saying. But then, when push comes to shove, if they demanded that we don’t use their content, then we just wouldn’t use their content. It’s not like that’s going to change the outcome of this stuff that much.
Recent articles
- DeepSeek V4 - almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price - 24th April 2026
- Extract PDF text in your browser with LiteParse for the web - 23rd April 2026
- A pelican for GPT-5.5 via the semi-official Codex backdoor API - 23rd April 2026