26th September 2024
I think individual creators or publishers tend to overestimate the value of their specific content in the grand scheme of [AI training]. […]
We pay for content when it’s valuable to people. We’re just not going to pay for content when it’s not valuable to people. I think that you’ll probably see a similar dynamic with AI, which my guess is that there are going to be certain partnerships that get made when content is really important and valuable. I’d guess that there are probably a lot of people who have a concern about the feel of it, like you’re saying. But then, when push comes to shove, if they demanded that we don’t use their content, then we just wouldn’t use their content. It’s not like that’s going to change the outcome of this stuff that much.
Recent articles
- Experimenting with Starlette 1.0 with Claude skills - 22nd March 2026
- Profiling Hacker News users based on their comments - 21st March 2026
- Thoughts on OpenAI acquiring Astral and uv/ruff/ty - 19th March 2026