1st June 2023
He notes that one simulated test saw an AI-enabled drone tasked with a SEAD mission to identify and destroy SAM sites, with the final go/no go given by the human. However, having been ‘reinforced’ in training that destruction of the SAM was the preferred option, the AI then decided that ‘no-go’ decisions from the human were interfering with its higher mission – killing SAMs – and then attacked the operator in the simulation.
[UPDATE: This turned out to be a "thought experiment" intentionally designed to illustrate how these things could go wrong.]
— Highlights from the RAeS Future Combat Air & Space Capabilities Summit
Recent articles
- OpenAI’s accidental cyberattack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened - 22nd July 2026
- A Fireside Chat with Cat and Thariq from the Claude Code team - 21st July 2026
- Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark - 16th July 2026