Simon Willison’s Weblog

Misapplying book terms, Pylons, and the 'end-user'. Ben Bangert responds to Adam Gomaa’s claim that Pylons lacks “conceptual integrity”.

Posted 19th December 2007 at 11:09 am

Recent articles

Trying out the new Gemini 2.5 model family - 17th June 2025
The lethal trifecta for AI agents: private data, untrusted content, and external communication - 16th June 2025
An Introduction to Google’s Approach to AI Agent Security - 15th June 2025

adam-gomaa 3 ben-bangert 2 pylons 6 python 1157

Monthly briefing

Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments.

Pay me to send you less!

Sponsor & subscribe