Misapplying book terms, Pylons, and the 'end-user'. Ben Bangert responds to Adam Gomaa’s claim that Pylons lacks “conceptual integrity”.
Recent articles
- I think "agent" may finally have a widely enough agreed upon definition to be useful jargon now - 18th September 2025
- My review of Claude's new Code Interpreter, released under a very confusing name - 9th September 2025
- Recreating the Apollo AI adoption rate chart with GPT-5, Python and Pyodide - 9th September 2025