10th February 2011
Before events took this bad turn, the contract represented by a link was simple: “Here’s a string, send it off to a server and the server will figure out what it identifies and send you back a representation.” Now it’s along the lines of: “Here’s a string, save the hashbang, send the rest to the server, and rely on being able to run the code the server sends you to use the hashbang to generate the representation.” Do I need to explain why this is less robust and flexible? This is what we call “tight coupling” and I thought that anyone with a Computer Science degree ought to have been taught to avoid it.
— Tim Bray
Recent articles
- Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive - 11th June 2026
- Initial impressions of Claude Fable 5 - 9th June 2026
- Running Python code in a sandbox with MicroPython and WASM - 6th June 2026