1GB of webmail from Google
Provided this story about a new 1 GB webmail service from Google isn’t a lame early April fool, I’m really psyched about it. A decent amount of space combined with Google’s search technology could really help me keep up to date with my email. Just off the top of my head, here’s my ideal hosted webmail feature list:
- Costs between two and ten dollars a month. This is a critical service I’m entrusting to a company—I want the reassurance that there’s cold hard cash on the line if they screw anything up. Paying for a no-ads option is fine too.
- Smart filtering. I’m on a bunch of different mailing lists and can’t live without filters.
- “Virtual folders”—things like “all emails from this person”, “emails sent to this person” should be on hand at all times.
- Import and export mail as mbox files. Don’t lock me in!
- Decent spam filtering, obviously.
- Send plain text, receieve plain text. No HTML in either direction.
- Kick-arse search.
I don’t really have very complex needs, which is why I’m so frustrated that so far nothing I’ve tried has done what I need it to. Here’s hoping Google can hit the mark.
Update: The Google press release is dated April 1st. Given their history, it’s almost certainly a hoax. Aah well, we can dream.
Richard - 1st April 2004 03:11 - #
Simon Willison - 1st April 2004 03:20 - #
Richard - 1st April 2004 03:43 - #
Scott Johnson - 1st April 2004 03:48 - #
Simon Willison - 1st April 2004 03:55 - #
Ilya Haykinson - 1st April 2004 04:16 - #
selda - 1st April 2004 04:55 - #
Sure, hard drives are dirt cheap these days. Sure, it's feasible. But Google has a history with April Fool's Day.
Scott Johnson - 1st April 2004 05:51 - #
[2] Email Heaven
Jens-Christian Fischer - 1st April 2004 07:43 - #
Ben Thorp - 1st April 2004 08:32 - #
Ronan - 1st April 2004 09:25 - #
I can speak from personal experience when I say that publication of a story in national media, and for that matter in Wired, is no guarantee of its veracity. An April Fools'-like joke I created at CWRU was reported as if real in Wired, The Washington Post, and several other outlets.
I personally e-mailed both Wired and the WP to inform them of the truth, and of the two, only the WP ever printed a correction. Wired never acknowledged that they'd screwed up. (Go figure.)
So, while GMail may or may not be a joke, don't take its serious treatment in the media as an indication of anything.
Eric Meyer - 1st April 2004 12:43 - #
Michel Valdrighi - 1st April 2004 13:25 - #
Hmmm, appears the BBC has been suckered too.
Though 1GB per user isn't going to be much of a problem, afterall Google uses OpenSource and I'm sure they'd have heard of GNU/LZip... :D
Jonathan Stanley - 1st April 2004 15:08 - #
Martin Alderson - 1st April 2004 16:20 - #
Gledster2000 - 1st April 2004 18:14 - #
Sounds like a shrewd move on Google's part to me. They can use April 1st to test the waters without committing to anything at all.
The 1GB limit for users need not be a problem for Google. How many accounts are going to grow beyond even a few MBs? I am sure there will be some form of limitation on the size and total number of attachments applied to outgoing mail too.
I'll admit that the "closed beta testing" that nobody has heard about is a bit suspect though.
I want it to be true just for shaking up webmail's sake but I wouldn't put money on it - yet.
Danny Shepherd - 1st April 2004 18:38 - #
Matt Brubeck - 1st April 2004 22:51 - #
Gary - 2nd April 2004 02:11 - #
John Carver - 11th April 2004 12:45 - #
mahmood - 20th August 2004 13:04 - #
Ernesto - 10th September 2004 07:18 - #
Vladas - 13th October 2004 19:35 - #
Tony White - 15th October 2004 03:34 - #
rofi - 20th October 2004 05:45 - #
Sam M Khan - 29th October 2004 17:34 - #
PoopyPants - 31st October 2004 17:24 - #
quang - 11th November 2004 09:14 - #
lloyd - 27th November 2004 04:38 - #
beano - 25th December 2004 02:18 - #
hi - 30th December 2004 10:55 - #
huphtur - 4th March 2005 17:43 - #
Nguyen Dai Vu - 19th June 2005 17:45 - #
saurabh - 16th July 2005 14:17 - #
Jacob - 18th August 2005 09:37 - #
jack - 18th August 2005 09:38 - #
SANJAY SHARMA - 23rd August 2005 15:44 - #
adsl101 - 3rd September 2005 06:21 - #
ahmed - 15th September 2005 20:13 - #
piyush - 22nd September 2005 19:44 - #
umesh kumar - 7th November 2005 10:20 - #
Htin Aung Kyaw - 2nd December 2005 09:56 - #
sirivantha - 21st July 2006 16:37 - #