Don’t make me lie to you
So what’s the deal with this?

I’m sure you’ve seen it. I get it from QuickTime on Windows, and I get it from QuickTime on my Mac as well. If this was attached to some lousy spyware infested privacy flaunting piece of junk I wouldn’t be so surprised, but it’s not: it’s from Apple, a company who are meant to pride themselves on the usability of their software; software that normally just gets out of the way. So why bug me with this junk? More importantly, why force me to lie about my intentions? I have absolutely no intention of ever upgrading to QuickTime Pro—but every time that blasted window comes up I have to promise to put off my purchasing decision until “Later” in order to proceed.
It annoys me even more because out of all the lousy streaming media formats out there, QuickTime sucks the least. Why spoil the experience with an advert for a product that seems to be made obsolete by Apple’s own iMovie anyway?
John Magnus - 7th May 2004 02:46 - #
Hah! I was going to mention Media Player Classic too. These days I don't touch any media player that comes straight from a commercial vendor, simply because I've never had a good experience with them. Even if Apple didn't have that Quicktime Pro ad screen, Quicktime player would be a horrible piece of shit.
Give me foobar 2000 for my music, Windows Media Player classic with plugins for movies, and I'm set.
Lach - 7th May 2004 03:32 - #
Matt - 7th May 2004 04:30 - #
jbelkin - 7th May 2004 06:32 - #
rayg - 7th May 2004 08:43 - #
Simon, I'm pretty sure you don't mean flaunting. How about "slighting"?
Jeremy Dunck - 7th May 2004 13:48 - #
Loyd - 7th May 2004 13:53 - #
waylman - 7th May 2004 14:48 - #
Melangell - 7th May 2004 14:57 - #
Tom - 7th May 2004 16:34 - #
They've been doing it since way back before it was popular, it's been there since 1993 or something stupid like that when QuickTime first came out and no-one new about the Pro version and it was all a big deal. I have no idea why they still do it. Everyone who wants QTP will get it. Everyone who doesn't wont.
Xian - 7th May 2004 17:33 - #
deepkid - 7th May 2004 20:23 - #
Tim - 7th May 2004 20:38 - #
Charles - 7th May 2004 23:18 - #
Tim-- except for the fact that MS is using Windows Media Player as a deployment mechanism for DRM license agreements, I think Media Player doesn't suck.
Is there a name for the type of idiot that slams a major audience segment for no apparent reason on a technical blog?
Jeremy Dunck - 8th May 2004 02:51 - #
solid - 8th May 2004 15:00 - #
Gemal had a similar problem not too long ago. His solution was to combine Winamp with the RealAlternative and QuickTimeAlternative codecs from the KL Codec Resource Site mentioned earlier. Works like a charm!
I don't recommend installing the entire codec pack because it can lead to problems. Note that you need to add the extra file types to the Directshow encoder's extension list as described here.
Basje - 8th May 2004 15:47 - #
I can second (third?) the date solution. I've done this on all my Windoze machines (they need re-imaging every three months or so), and did it on my Mac ages ago when I installed Panther. Works like a dream.
And yes, it is an annoyance — but it has to be better than WMP ;o)
Ben Poole - 8th May 2004 20:56 - #
Ryan - 9th May 2004 18:50 - #
Steven Garrity - 9th May 2004 19:30 - #
While I agree this is annoying, I don't agree that iMovie has replaced QuickTime Pro. For batch processing, QTPro used to be the best solution. Instead, I think that ffmpeg has replaced QTPro (at least in my workshop) for batch manipulation. While it doesn't support encoding to QT, it does support MPEG4, which is essentially the same thing but standards compliant. Getting ffmpeg is as easy these days as:
from a root prompt.
Robert - 10th May 2004 21:16 - #
QuickTime first came out what, 12 years ago? And let's see ... if since then, I've averaged viewing three clips or streams a week, that means I've seen the "Go Pro" dialog, umm, 1,872 times!
It has become like an old friend who stops by the front door unannounced a few too many times. Familiar, comfortable, even expected, but never welcome!
Jay Small - 11th May 2004 13:06 - #
Apache' - 11th May 2004 17:06 - #
Apache' - 11th May 2004 17:06 - #
David - 12th May 2004 09:46 - #
philsci - 12th May 2004 19:46 - #
David - Thanks. This is an interesting usage quandary which I never knew about.
Similar to cleave, really.
Jeremy Dunck - 13th May 2004 00:20 - #
simon othen - 16th June 2005 04:30 - #
Neil Slade - 12th November 2005 05:22 - #