Feed Sign in with OpenID OpenID

Simon Willison’s Weblog

Decentralised social networking

I know I’m late to the party, but my recent experiments with LinkedIn and Friendster have got me all interested in the potential of software that bulids on top of people’s own social networks. There’s just one thing that’s been bugging me, best explained by this quote from Om Malik:

The question I have is: why the F**K should I share my network of contacts with these commercial entities. They are like BlogSpot that does nothing for my brand equity and in many ways chews me out after making the network connections. Thus what I want is a “MoveableType” of social networking. Blogs took off because it was about one person—me. My social networks should be of my making for me. Lets figure out a way to cut out the middlemen.

Via John Battelle, here’s the answer: Plink, a social search engine which uses information crawled from decentralised FOAF files. It’s nicely put together and could be just the incentive I need to finally put together my own FOAF file.

Plink is also a nice example of the kind of thing the semantic web hopes to offer. People provide information in easily parsed formats, then others bulid third party applications on top of them that may never have been envisaged by the creators of the original standards. Feedster is another great example of this effect in action.

This is Decentralised social networking by Simon Willison, posted on 6th January 2004.

View blog reactions

Next: PaWS 2004

Previous: Targets for 2004

7 comments

  1. Plink is nice in the sense that it uses a distributed datastore. However you it still isn't as "me centric" as one might hope. In particular it requires you to make all your social network information publicly available to the entire world. That seems problematic, even prior to our era of guilt by association.

    kellan - 6th January 2004 03:47 - #

  2. Another way to achieve decentralized social networking is XFN, which builds on top of HTML without breaking validation. It's not a finished work, but it does point to ways to reach the kinds of goals you mentioned.

    Eric Meyer - 6th January 2004 03:59 - #

  3. I was going to recommend you check out XFN, but I see that Eric has beaten me here. XFN implies a trust metric that could be highly useful to nascent distributed social networking applications. Not to mention, the most successful social networking efforts thus far have been the easiest, an area where I believe XFN excels.

    Matt - 6th January 2004 07:39 - #

  4. I think that the whole notion of centralisation is bad in the social-network software environment. After all, "My Network" is a very personal thing. And that is best managed by me, not by any authority. Why did Napster take off the way it did? Because it enabled everybody to actually do what they wanted to do: Share (information).

    Jens-Christian Fischer - 6th January 2004 12:03 - #

  5. I posted a lengthy rumination on this just a couple days ago, oddly enough. I agree--Plink is quite nice, but it's just a start.

    Adam Rice - 6th January 2004 16:21 - #

  6. I just don't get social network software. There's no value to it other than politics, ego boosting and selling out folks for spamway services. If this is supposed to be something for my benefit, what value does it have over bookmarks, buddylists, addressbooks, blogrolls and all the other, better managed things?

    jr - 6th January 2004 17:14 - #

  7. Kellan, you don't require you to make all personal info publicly available to the entire world. Protecting your personal information in a FOAF context is possible using public key encryption for example. For further information I would suggest checking out a brief howto on encrypting Foaf files. You may also want to look into signing your Foaf file as well.

    Ben Meadowcroft - 7th January 2004 12:57 - #

Comments are closed.

Previously hosted at http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2004/01/06/decentralised

A django site