Thunderbird supports extensions
I’ve been pretty unexcited by Thunderbird so far: I’m pretty picky about my mail clients (so far Evolution is the only client I’ve really liked) and Mozilla’s never really lived up to my expectiations. I’m preparing to change my mind now that Thunderbird supports extensions. Firebird’s extensive collection of extensions is one of its strongest advantages, and the idea of a mail client that can be customised in a whole bunch of different ways by adding new extensions is pretty inspiring. I might even have to try and learn to write some myself.
Aaron Brazell - 19th June 2003 04:34 - #
Just curious: Have you tried KDE's KMail, and if so, why didn't you continue using it? Evolution didn't do it for me, so I moved to KMail and haven't looked back.
Not to start a mail-client debate, of course.
Adrian Holovaty - 19th June 2003 04:52 - #
richard - 19th June 2003 07:08 - #
Simon Willison - 19th June 2003 16:58 - #
KMail has great filter support, including context-menu stuff such as "Filter on Subject...", "Filter on To...", etc.
Adrian Holovaty - 19th June 2003 18:18 - #
I've always used Outlook (mainly because of the syncing with my Pocket PC), but I use Firebird as my default browser. I thought I'd investigate Thunderbird for use on my laptop and what I thought was ...
Some people might think this is no bad thing, but for me the reason to move across is not clear. Having a trawl through the menu items didn't reveal anything too enticing.
Am I missing something?
I think what's needed is a run-down of the features and why you should convert - just like they did with Firebird, 'cos right now I just ain't gettin it!
Ian Lloyd - 20th June 2003 08:56 - #
Ian Lloyd - 20th June 2003 08:59 - #
m - 10th February 2004 02:12 - #
I've been using Evolution and Thunderbird a lot and I can tell you that they use the same underlying mailbox structure (some UNIX standard mail format).
What that means is that you can manually move mailboxes between the two programs, as long as you have a matching folder structure.
eg. folder inbox in Evolution has a file called mbox (which is the mail store).
In Thunderbird, there is a similar file, this time called inbox.
The key point here is that in Evolution the file is always called mbox and the directory structure defines what the actual message box is, whereas in Thunderbird the file is always named after the message folder.
Simply copying one across to the other and changing the name makes its contents available - I know this works because I ported all my Evolution mail to Thunderbird. And that was between Linux Evolution and WINXP Thunderbird.
Now, you could be really clever and symbolically link the two files, so that whichever program you used was up to date. I've not tried this yet but I am about to.
Finally, it should be relatively easy to write a small script that ports the boxes between the mailers. With a bit of cleverness, it might even be able to generate the appropriate directory and subdirectory structures.
Robin Layfield - 14th June 2004 19:31 - #
Rob Robertson - 29th June 2004 05:22 - #
Ken Lov - 8th September 2004 14:58 - #